Part of the Bright Sparks series, written by Andy Moffitt, Chief Operating Officer
Whether it’s with suppliers, delivery partners, or internal teams, very little is achieved in isolation. Yet partnership is also one of the areas where good intentions often outpace good design.
It’s easy to move quickly, to formalise a collaboration that looks promising and seems to align with shared ambitions. But a partnership built on convenience rarely stays convenient for long. The real work begins once the agreement is signed — when the systems meet, the priorities are tested, and the differences in pace and approach start to show.
Partnership, when it works, is one of the most powerful accelerators of progress. When it doesn’t, it consumes time, energy, and trust. The difference lies less in process than in preparedness — how clearly both sides understand what they are trying to achieve together, and how they will manage the realities that follow.
The best partnerships begin with definition. Not of scope or deliverables, but of purpose. True alignment means agreeing what success looks like for both sides — before the project even begins. Why this collaboration, at this time, with this partner?
It’s easy to assume that goals are shared simply because the language sounds familiar. But words like “innovation,” “efficiency,” or “transformation” often carry different meanings in different contexts. Unless that is surfaced early, it can quietly become the source of friction later.
A good partnership takes the time to clarify expectations, not just commitments. It accepts that difference is inevitable, but conflict doesn’t have to be. Clarity gives room for adjustment, and adjustment is where progress happens.
The right partner reinforces your strengths and complements your gaps. The wrong one diverts attention and erodes confidence. Choosing who to work with is not just a commercial decision; it’s a cultural one.
Without risking cultural appropriation – we could use the analogy of marriage. FamilFit comes from shared values, compatible pace, and open communication — the things that make collaboration sustainable. Technical skill and price matter, but they only create potential. What delivers results is how well the two sides operate together under pressure.
It’s also about temperament. Some partnerships thrive on challenge and debate; others need steadiness and rhythm. Understanding this before you start avoids misreading tension as failure. Constructive challenge, handled well, is often the mark of a healthy relationship.
Flashy partnerships — those driven by visibility rather than value — rarely endure. The ones that do last are those built quietly, on mutual understanding and a shared commitment to getting the work done well.
When expectations diverge, politics fills the gap. Misunderstandings turn into assumptions, and assumptions into noise. The work slows down, not because the goal has changed, but because ownership has become unclear.
Politics is rarely deliberate. It grows in the spaces where structure is missing. The solution is rarely more control, but more clarity — clarity of role, of decision-making, of communication. Each side should know what it is accountable for, and where collaboration begins and ends.
Healthy partnerships feel calm even when the work is complex. They are built on mutual respect and on the confidence that issues can be raised early, without theatre. When transparency is the norm, politics doesn’t find space to take hold.
Partnership isn’t a transaction; it’s a capability. It depends on habits as much as on contracts — how we communicate, how we listen, and how we adapt when things don’t go to plan.
Building external relationships should mirror how we lead internally: with consistency, honesty, and care. The qualities that make for strong teams — accountability, openness, trust — are the same ones that make for enduring partnerships.
It also means knowing when to step away. Not every partnership will fit forever, and that’s not failure. Ending something with respect often preserves credibility for future collaboration. What matters is maintaining integrity throughout the process.
Progress relies on partnership done well. It’s what turns ambition into delivery and strategy into movement. And like any discipline, it improves with practice.
In the end, partnerships that last are rarely the loudest or the most celebrated. They’re the ones that make work feel easier, decisions clearer, and outcomes stronger — quietly successful because they’re built on understanding, not urgency.
Andy is passionate about efficient operations and knowing exactly when to bring in the right partners.
Spark the conversation with Andy
Emerging technology has an irresistible pull. Every CIO knows the feeling: a new platform promises efficiency, a new algorithm claims intelligence, a new vendor insists you’re falling behind. The pressure to adopt can be immense — from boards, from peers, from the market itself.
Read now
It’s often said that Albert Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. Whether or not he said it, the point stands. Organisations talk endlessly about change, yet so often repeat the same mistakes.
Read now
Progress shouldn’t feel this hard. Yet for many organisations, despite years of digital investment, transformation can feel like driving with the handbrake on. The ambition and tools are there but something unseen slows everything down.
Read now
True modernisation is less about speed – and more about substance. We talk about modernisation as if it’s a race – a finish line you can cross and then move on. It isn’t.
Read now
The best kind of change is often the kind you don’t notice happening. Systems run smoother, processes feel easier, people stop sighing at their screens – and suddenly everything just works a little better.
Read now
Partnerships sit at the heart of how most organisations now operate. Whether it’s suppliers, delivery partners, or internal teams, very little is achieved in isolation.
Read now
Chief Operating Officer (COO)
Andy Moffitt is Roc's Chief Operating Officer, leading all Services delivery into customers. Andy brings with him over 30 years experience in the IT Services industry gained at places like SCC and Computacenter. Outside of work, whilst his playing days are over Andy actively supports his local rugby club and holds a season ticket at a top Premier League football club.
The best kind of change is often the kind you don’t notice happening. Systems run smoother, processes feel easier, people stop sighing at their screens – and suddenly everything just works a little better.
True modernisation is less about speed – and more about substance. We talk about modernisation as if it’s a race – a finish line you can cross and then move on. It isn’t.
The modern enterprise has shifted beyond recognition.
Hybrid working is embedded, cloud adoption continues at pace, and data now moves across a range of devices, locations, and applications. As this digital footprint expands, the traditional network perimeter has dissolved.
AI has altered the physics of cybersecurity. Threats now move faster than policies can adapt, and defences evolve in real time. The traditional idea of resilience – static controls, periodic reviews, and defined perimeters – no longer fits.
In an era where many students invest over £60,000 in a university education, the question of value for money has become a defining factor in university choice. But “value” is not universal.
Enterprise networks have reached an inflection point. Hybrid working is now embedded, cloud applications proliferate, and data moves continuously between users, devices and locations. UK organisations now manage more cloud identities than traditional endpoints, and more than half of enterprise traffic originates outside the office. As a result, network reliability, security and performance have shifted from operational concerns to board-level priorities.
AI is now woven into every part of cybersecurity operations. It analyses behaviour, identifies anomalies, and increasingly, takes action on its own. It’s faster, tireless, and in many cases more consistent than any analyst could be. But with that progress comes a harder question: how much decision-making are we prepared to give away?
There’s no escaping the squeeze. Demand is rising, budgets are flat, and no one’s in the mood for another “game-changing” announcement. People have heard so many promises of ‘once in a generation’ transformation that hype doesn’t hold much weight anymore.
There’s a moment every organization faces when it has to stop pretending the cracks aren’t there. The systems that don’t quite talk to each other. The processes everyone works around. The decisions that were right once — but no longer are.